高级检索
    陈云霁 马 麟 沈海华 胡伟武. 龙芯2号微处理器浮点除法功能部件的形式验证[J]. 计算机研究与发展, 2006, 43(10): 1835-1841.
    引用本文: 陈云霁 马 麟 沈海华 胡伟武. 龙芯2号微处理器浮点除法功能部件的形式验证[J]. 计算机研究与发展, 2006, 43(10): 1835-1841.
    Chen Yunji, Ma Lin, Shen Haihua, and Hu Weiwu. Formal Verification of Godson-2 Microprocessor Floating-Point Division Unit[J]. Journal of Computer Research and Development, 2006, 43(10): 1835-1841.
    Citation: Chen Yunji, Ma Lin, Shen Haihua, and Hu Weiwu. Formal Verification of Godson-2 Microprocessor Floating-Point Division Unit[J]. Journal of Computer Research and Development, 2006, 43(10): 1835-1841.

    龙芯2号微处理器浮点除法功能部件的形式验证

    Formal Verification of Godson-2 Microprocessor Floating-Point Division Unit

    • 摘要: 基于决策图的字级模型检验方法虽然能完全验证运算电路,但它从有缺陷的设计中发现系统规范的反例所需时间较长.而基于SAT的有界模型检验方法虽然能较快地发现反例,但它不支持包含数学公式的系统规范,因而难以用于验证运算电路.提出了基于SAT的字级模型检验方法,该方法将CNF扩展为能混合布尔公式和数学公式的E-CNF用以表示设计和系统规范,并对有界模型检验工具和SAT求解器进行字级的扩展,使它们能分别生成和处理E-CNF.龙芯2号微处理器浮点除法功能部件验证同时采用了基于*PHDD和基于SAT的字级模型检验方法.数据表明,基于SAT的字级模型检验方法能快速地发现运算电路中的设计缺陷.两种方法互为补充,在能完全验证设计的同时显著缩短了设计周期.

       

      Abstract: Word level model checking based on decision diagrams can verify arithmetic circuits completely, but its bug finding is time-consuming. SAT-based bounded model checking is powerful in bug finding, but it does not support specification with mathematic formula. In this paper, the SAT-based word level model checking method is presented. This method extends CNF to E-CNF which can represent both Boolean formula and mathematic formula, and extends bounded model checking and SAT solver to word level to cooperate with E-CNF. Experiments show that SAT-based model checking is powerful in bug finding for arithmetic circuit. The verification of floating-point division unit of Godson-2 microprocessor adopts both *PHDD-based and SAT-based model checking methods. These two methods are excellently complementary to each other, giving the ability to completely verify design as well as shorten design cycle.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回