高级检索
    赵 辉 杨树强 陈志坤 尹 洪 金松昌. 基于MapReduce模型的范围查询分析优化技术研究[J]. 计算机研究与发展, 2014, 51(3): 606-617.
    引用本文: 赵 辉 杨树强 陈志坤 尹 洪 金松昌. 基于MapReduce模型的范围查询分析优化技术研究[J]. 计算机研究与发展, 2014, 51(3): 606-617.
    Zhao Hui, Yang Shuqiang, Chen Zhikun, Yin Hong, and Jin Songchang. Optimization of Range Queries and Analysis for MapReduce Systems[J]. Journal of Computer Research and Development, 2014, 51(3): 606-617.
    Citation: Zhao Hui, Yang Shuqiang, Chen Zhikun, Yin Hong, and Jin Songchang. Optimization of Range Queries and Analysis for MapReduce Systems[J]. Journal of Computer Research and Development, 2014, 51(3): 606-617.

    基于MapReduce模型的范围查询分析优化技术研究

    Optimization of Range Queries and Analysis for MapReduce Systems

    • 摘要: 近年来,MapReduce并行计算模型受到工业界和学术界广泛关注.基于该模型的系统实现已在谷歌、雅虎、Facebook等大公司内部成功应用.然而,基于MapReduce的系统实现最初用于解决海量无结构、半结构化数据的批处理问题,例如生成倒排索引、计算网页的pagerank、日志分析等,在设计上缺乏针对海量结构化数据进行交互式分析处理的优化考虑,例如:它总是采用全数据集强力扫描的数据处理模式,这有悖于结构化数据管理中常用的操作模式——选择性查询分析处理.针对该问题,引入传统数据库管理领域中常用的全局索引技术,将其应用在基于MapReduce模型的开源项目Hadoop上,以block为粒度对Hadoop分布式文件系统上的结构化数据构建全局索引结构,并给出一种面向范围查询分析的作业编译与调度执行优化算法,主要目标是基于应用语义及辅助索引结构减少不必要的map任务数,进而优化作业的调度开销和执行开销.在实验验证阶段,给出了80%,50%,30%,10%四种数据选择率在3种集群规模下的优化效果,发现作业响应时间最高可提升5倍,I/O开销最高提升10倍,任务调度开销最高提升11倍.

       

      Abstract: Recently, MapReduce parallel computing paradigm has gained extensive attention from industry and academia. MapReduce works well in Google, Yahoo! and Facebook on massive data processing. However, MapReduce-based systems originally were used to manage massive un-structured and semi-structured data, such as inverted indexing, Web page ranking, log analyzing etc. They ignored the optimizing of structured data, such as the brute-force scanning, which is inefficient for some common workloads in structured data management, such as select, filter etc. For this problem, we introdue a global indexing technology, which has been widely used in database, aiming to optimizing queries and analysis in a range of the overall dataset. Global index will help reduce redundant map tasks, resulting in decreasing the cost of I/O and scheduling. Finally, we evaluate the effect of our framework by four data selection ratios which are 80%, 50%, 30% and 10% under different cluster sizes. We find that the response time has 5x improvement at most, I/O cost improves 10x at most and cost of scheduling improves 11x at most.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回