高级检索

    人工智能辅助的芯片物理设计方法综述

    Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Chip Physical Design: A Survey

    • 摘要: 随着半导体技术的发展,芯片物理设计面临日益增长的复杂度与多目标优化挑战,传统电子设计自动化(electronic design automation,EDA)工具在效率与收敛性上面临瓶颈。人工智能(artificial intelligence,AI)技术,特别是深度学习与强化学习,为数据驱动的设计优化提供了新范式。本文系统综述了AI方法在芯片物理设计四个核心阶段——版图规划、布局、时钟树综合与布线中的应用进展。首先,从优化目标角度,梳理了各阶段代表性AI方法及其技术贡献;其次,批判性分析了学术数据与工业级场景间的差异,揭示了关键数据瓶颈;再次,评述了不同阶段AI方法与传统EDA流程的集成方式;而后,系统总结了各阶段AI方法的演进趋势,指出从单点优化、几何驱动向跨阶段协同、AI原生设计的范式转变;尽管AI方法已显著提升设计效率与质量,其广泛应用仍受限于数据稀缺、模型可解释性不足以及与现有工具链的集成挑战,因此在最后,分析现有芯片物理设计AI方法的局限性,并展望开源AI-EDA基础设施、电路大模型、AI原生EDA等未来研究方向。

       

      Abstract: As semiconductor technology scales, chip physical design confronts escalating complexity and multi-objective optimization challenges, with traditional electronic design automation (EDA) tools encountering bottlenecks in computational efficiency and convergence. Artificial intelligence (AI), specifically deep learning (DL) and reinforcement learning (RL), offers a transformative paradigm for data-driven optimization in physical design. This survey systematically reviews the application of AI methods in the four core stages of chip physical design: floorplanning, placement, clock tree synthesis, and routing. First, from the perspective of optimization objectives, representative AI methods and their technical contributions in each stage are summarized. Second, a critical analysis of the gap between academic datasets and industrial scenarios is conducted, revealing key data bottlenecks. Third, the integration approaches between AI methods and traditional EDA flows across different stages are examined. Then, the evolutionary trends of AI methods in each stage are systematically reviewed, highlighting the paradigm shift from isolated, geometry-driven optimization toward cross-stage collaboration and AI-native chip physical design. Although AI methods have significantly improved design efficiency and quality, their widespread adoption is still limited by data scarcity, insufficient model interpretability, and challenges in integration with existing toolchains. Finally, we discuss the limitations of existing AI-driven approaches in physical chip design and outline promising research directions, including open-source AI-EDA infrastructure, large circuit foundation models, and AI-native EDA.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回