高级检索

    多项正则化约束的伪标签传播优化脑电信号聚类

    Electroencephalogram Clustering with Multiple Regularization Constrained Pseudo Label Propagation Optimization

    • 摘要: 作为一种非侵入式分析载体, 脑电信号目前被广泛应用于脑-机接口、医疗辅助诊断及康复领域, 但这些应用通常依赖需要完整标签的有监督分析技术, 如分类. 随着无标签脑电信号的与日俱增, 现有的有监督方法不能有效解决无标签脑电信号分析问题, 也在一定程度上限制了无标签脑电信号这类新型数据的应用拓展. 为了解决无标签脑电信号的无监督分析问题, 提出了一种基于多项正则化约束的伪标签传播优化聚类模型. 该模型通过同时优化学习伪标签传播矩阵、脑电信号相似度邻接矩阵、标签分类器的方式实现聚类. 将提出的脑电信号聚类模型转化为一个多目标优化问题, 并提出了一种基于梯度下降策略的聚类算法EEGapc (electroencephalogram clustering with pseudo label propagation). 该算法不仅充分考虑了脑电信号之间的相关性及脑电信号间的信息传递, 还能快速收敛到局部最优. 在14个真实脑电信号数据集上的实验结果表明, 提出的EEGapc脑电信号聚类算法比现有的8种聚类算法性能更好, 且在平均NMI (normalized mutual information), ARI (adjusted rand index), F-score, kappa 这4个指标上, EEGapc与现有的8种聚类算法相比, 分别至少提升了86.88%, 58.01%, 6.29%, 61.17%.

       

      Abstract: As the non-invasive analyzing media, electroencephalogram (EEG) signals are widely applied in brain-computer interfaces, dysfunctional disorder diagnosis and rehabilitation. However, the techniques used in such applications are supervised and completely require EEG labels, like classification. Meanwhile, with the ever-increasing of unlabeled EEG emerged in these applications, traditional supervised techniques are becoming inapplicable, which probably degrades the development of this new-type unlabeled EEG in the emerging potential fields. To deal with the issue of unsupervised analysis for unlabeled EEG signals, we propose a multiple regularization constrained pseudo label propagation optimization model, which integrates the pseudo label propagation learning, EEG similarity adjacency matrix approximation, and label classifier learning. Subsequently, to pursuit the goal of EEG clustering with the proposed model, we transform the model to a multi-objective optimization function and propose a gradient descent-based algorithm named EEGapc (electroencephalogram clustering with pseudo label propagation) to solve it. EEGapc not only can make best use of messages passing through pairwise EEG signals in EEG-constructed graph, but can also quickly converge to its local optima. Experimental results by comparing EEGapc with 8 different types of state-of-the-art clustering algorithms on 14 real-world EEG data sets clearly demonstrate the superiority of EEGapc, and its performances with respect to average NMI (normalized mutual information), ARI (adjusted rand index), F-score and kappa are at least improved by 86.88%, 58.01%, 6.29%, 61.17%, respectively.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回