高级检索

    量化测试高性能L5-Dispatcher

    Quantitative Measurement of High Performance L5-Dispatcher

    • 摘要: 主要内容是关于HTTPSplicing的性能评测 HTTPSplicing是针对TCPSplicing的缺陷而提出的 ,TCPSplicing现被广泛应用在L5 Dispatcher(即基于内容的Web交换机 )中 测试内容包括开销测试、性能测试、与L4 Dispatcher的对比测试、与TCPSplicing的对比测试和扩展性测试 所获得的结论为 :当尽力 (besteffort)访问 1KB大小的文件时 ,HTTPSplicing的性能要比TCPSplicing至少快 3 5倍 ,而当尽力访问 10KB大小的文件时 ,HTTPSplicing的性能比TCPSplic ing的性能高 2 2 % 当尽力访问 30 7KB大小的文件时 ,HTTPSplicing的一种实现———WebPatcher———的最好性能值为5 5 5 6 8replies/s ,超过了ArrowPoint公司的CS 10 0 (1193replies/s)和Alteon公司的ACEdirector 3(v6 0 2 5 ) (135 6replies/s).

       

      Abstract: This paper is mainly concerned with the performance evaluation of HTTP Splicing. Aiming at the flaws of TCP Splicing, HTTP Splicing, a method adopted widely by L5-dispatcher which is a sort of web content switch, is put forward. The testing methods include overhead testing, performance testing, testing contrasted with L4-dispatcher, testing contrasted with TCP Splicing, and scalability testing. The conclusions are: when accessing a 1KB file under best effort model, performance of HTTP Splicing is better than that of TCP Splicing at least by 3.5; while accessing a 10KB files under best effort model, performance of HTTP Splicing improves that of TCP Splicing by 22%. When accessing a 307 bytes file under best effort model, the best performance of an implementation of HTTP Splicing, WebPatcher, is 5556.8 replies/s, outdoing ArrowPoint Co.’s CS-100(1193 replies/s) and Alteon Co.’s ACEdirector 3(v6.0.25)(1356 replies/s).

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回