• 中国精品科技期刊
  • CCF推荐A类中文期刊
  • 计算领域高质量科技期刊T1类
Advanced Search
Du Zhijuan, Du Zhirong, Wang Lu. Open Knowledge Graph Representation Learning Based on Neighbors and Semantic Affinity[J]. Journal of Computer Research and Development, 2019, 56(12): 2549-2561. DOI: 10.7544/issn1000-1239.2019.20190648
Citation: Du Zhijuan, Du Zhirong, Wang Lu. Open Knowledge Graph Representation Learning Based on Neighbors and Semantic Affinity[J]. Journal of Computer Research and Development, 2019, 56(12): 2549-2561. DOI: 10.7544/issn1000-1239.2019.20190648

Open Knowledge Graph Representation Learning Based on Neighbors and Semantic Affinity

More Information
  • Published Date: November 30, 2019
  • Knowledge graph (KG) breaks the data isolation in different scenarios and provides basic support for the practical application. The representation learning transforms KG into the low-dimensional vector space to facilitate KG application. However, there are two problems in KG representation learning: 1)It is assumed that KG satisfies the closed-world assumption. It requires all entities to be visible during the training. In reality, most KGs are growing rapidly, e.g. a rate of 200 new entities per day in the DBPedia. 2)Complex semantic interaction, such as matrix projection and convolution, are used to improve the accuracy of the model and limit the scalability of the model. To this end, we propose a representation learning method TransNS for open KG that allows new entities to exist. It selects the related neighbors as the attribute of the entity to infer the new entity, and uses the semantic affinity between the entities to select the negative triple in the learning phase to enhance the semantic interaction capability. We compare our TransNS with the state-of-the-art baselines on 5 traditional and 8 new datasets. The results show that our TransNS performs well in the open KGs and even outperforms existing models on the baseline closed KGs.
  • Related Articles

    [1]Luo Yuanyi, Wu Rui, Liu Jiafeng, Tang Xianglong. Multimodal Sentiment Analysis Method for Sentimental Semantic Inconsistency[J]. Journal of Computer Research and Development, 2025, 62(2): 374-382. DOI: 10.7544/issn1000-1239.202330199
    [2]Attention-enhanced Semantic Fusion Knowledge Graph Representation Learning Framework[J]. Journal of Computer Research and Development. DOI: 10.7544/issn1000-1239.202440669
    [3]Fu Hao, Long Chun, Gong Liangyi, Wei Jinxia, Huang Pan, Lin Yanzhong, Sun Degang. Malicious Domain Detection Technology Based on Semantic Graph Learning[J]. Journal of Computer Research and Development. DOI: 10.7544/issn1000-1239.202440375
    [4]Hu Xuyang, Wang Zhizheng, Sun Yuanyuan, Xu Bo, Lin Hongfei. Knowledge Graph Representation Method Combined with Semantic Parsing[J]. Journal of Computer Research and Development, 2022, 59(12): 2878-2888. DOI: 10.7544/issn1000-1239.20210849
    [5]Meng Jun, Zhang Jing, Jiang Dingling, He Xinyu, Li Lishuang. Selective Ensemble Classification Integrated with Affinity Propagation Clustering[J]. Journal of Computer Research and Development, 2018, 55(5): 986-993. DOI: 10.7544/issn1000-1239.2018.20170077
    [6]Wen Changci, Wang Qin, Liu Xianghong, Huang Fumin, Yuan Zhishu. An Encryption Algorithm for Image Based on Affine and Composed Chaos[J]. Journal of Computer Research and Development, 2013, 50(2): 319-324.
    [7]Lu Weiming, Du Chenyang, Wei Baogang, Shen Chunhui, and Ye Zhenchao. Distributed Affinity Propagation Clustering Based on MapReduce[J]. Journal of Computer Research and Development, 2012, 49(8): 1762-1772.
    [8]Guan Renchu, Pei Zhili, Shi Xiaohu, Yang Chen, Liang Yanchun. Weight Affinity Propagation and Its Application to Text Clustering[J]. Journal of Computer Research and Development, 2010, 47(10): 1733-1740.
    [9]Lü Wenxian, Peng Qimin, Lü Yuzeng, Li Jun. An Affine-Invariant Objects Recognition Method Employing Features in Frequency Domain[J]. Journal of Computer Research and Development, 2009, 46(3): 478-484.
    [10]Lü Jianghua, Ma Shilong, Pan Jing, Jin Chengzhi. Denotational Semantics Transform from Continuation to Direct[J]. Journal of Computer Research and Development, 2006, 43(7): 1304-1308.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(14)

    1. 廖涛,沈文龙,张顺香,马文祥. 基于对抗训练的事件要素识别方法. 计算机工程与设计. 2024(02): 540-545 .
    2. 冯钧,畅阳红,陆佳民,唐海麟,吕志鹏,邱钰淳. 基于大语言模型的水工程调度知识图谱的构建与应用. 计算机科学与探索. 2024(06): 1637-1647 .
    3. 林海香,白万胜,赵正祥,胡娜娜,李冬,陆人杰. 面向高速铁路道岔运维文本的知识抽取方法. 铁道科学与工程学报. 2024(07): 2569-2580 .
    4. 刘文亮,吴飞,何德明,赵维伟,潘建宏. 基于相异度矩阵的碎片化回复文本聚类方法. 计算机与现代化. 2024(09): 56-60 .
    5. 乔勇鹏 ,于亚新 ,刘树越 ,王子腾 ,夏子芳 ,乔佳琪 . 图卷积增强多路解码的实体关系联合抽取模型. 计算机研究与发展. 2023(01): 153-166 . 本站查看
    6. 杨延云,杜建强,聂斌,罗计根,贺佳. 融合数据增强和注意力机制的中医实体及关系联合抽取. 智能计算机与应用. 2023(08): 186-191+196 .
    7. 王哲,谢玮. 基于改进CycleGan模型的动画视频CDS仿真. 计算机仿真. 2022(01): 195-199 .
    8. 魏晓,王晓鑫,陈永琪,张惠然. 基于自然语言处理的材料领域知识图谱构建方法. 上海大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(03): 386-398 .
    9. 董哲,王亚,马传孝,李志军. 融合对抗训练和胶囊网络的食品安全关系抽取模型. 科学技术与工程. 2022(23): 10162-10168 .
    10. 吴玉,付雪峰,王涛. 基于改进级联二元标记框架的关系抽取方法. 南昌工程学院学报. 2022(06): 86-90+111 .
    11. 何俊,刘鹏,聂勇,吴慎珂,刘鹏政,钟可佳. 基于Seq2seq实体关系联合抽取的电力知识图谱构建. 实验室研究与探索. 2022(07): 1-5+17 .
    12. 田佳来,吕学强,游新冬,肖刚,韩君妹. 基于分层序列标注的实体关系联合抽取方法. 北京大学学报(自然科学版). 2021(01): 53-60 .
    13. 付雷杰,曹岩,白瑀,冷杰武. 国内垂直领域知识图谱发展现状与展望. 计算机应用研究. 2021(11): 3201-3214 .
    14. 张军莲,张一帆,汪鸣泉,黄永健. 基于图卷积神经网络的中文实体关系联合抽取. 计算机工程. 2021(12): 103-111 .

    Other cited types(19)

Catalog

    Article views (1323) PDF downloads (752) Cited by(33)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return